Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sander Jong vs Tomas Lanik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Lanik analysis and find out who is favored!
Sander Jong vs Tomas Lanik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Lanik
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 53.11% of points on their second serve, while Lanik has won 43.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 48.51% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lanik has won 50.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.31% and 30.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lanik has saved 48.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 69.05% of matches played (W/L 58/ 26), with Lanik winning 49.02% (W/L 25/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jong has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 6/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 19/ 11). Lanik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 33/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Jong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.88% of matches (W/L 58/ 25), where as Lanik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jong winning 1 times and Lanik being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Lanik winning 0. The last match between Jong and Lanik was at the M25 Trnava, 09-11-2023, Second, I.hard with Sander Jong getting the victory 6-1 1-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jong and Lanik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jong winning 0 times and Lanik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jong winning 0, and Lanik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.17 while Lanik has played against players with an average rank of 79.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lanik has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 42.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lanik has converted 35.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
478
Rank
478
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
886
Rank
886
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
65% (74-40)
Career Total W/L
54% (84-73)
67% (22-11)
YTD W/L
17% (2-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sander Jong | Tomas Lanik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 7 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:32:0 | 0:32:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (10/19) | 81% (22/27) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 90% (9/10) | 23% (5/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (5/9) | 80% (4/5) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 67% (18/27) | 26% (5/19) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 1-0 ret. |
Stats 
Sander Jong
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
81%
(
22 of
27)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
32
Total Points Won
14
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sander Jong | Tomas Lanik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (22/11) | 17% (2/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (47/28) | 25% (7/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (392/334) | 42% (111/152) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.62 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 221 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 84 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:45 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 175.39 | 81.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1296/2053) | 58% (448/777) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (966/1296) | 59% (264/448) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (404/757) | 43% (142/329) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (86/200) | 35% (25/71) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (833/2141) | 38% (295/775) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (22/11) | 17% (2/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (22/33) | 17% (2/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 14% (1/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (7/0) |
Sander Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Sander Jong
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marc Antoine Gaillard
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Adam Briant
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Pawel Juszczak
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sebastian Sorger
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
84%
(
76 of
90)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sasa Markovic
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marcel Zielinski
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Kirill Mishkin
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Sander Jong
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomas Lanik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Noa Vukadin
Player
Tomas Lanik
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tomas Lanik
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Tomas Lanik
60%
(
78 of
131)
1st Serve %
52%
(
65 of
124)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
57 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaya Arinc
Player
Tomas Lanik
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Lanik
Player
Gregorio Biondolillo
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Tomas Lanik
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christos Antonopoulos
Player
Tomas Lanik
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
111)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Tomas Lanik
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jong Vs Lanik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
